BPH Treatment Comparison

This side-by-side guide compares available therapies based on effectiveness, invasiveness, recovery time, and impact on daily life, to help you make an informed decision.

TREATMENT/
CRITERIA

MEDICATION (ALPHA-BLOCKERS)

TURP

HOLEP

REZUM

ITIND

OPTILUME

METHOD/TECHNOLOGY

Oral medications that relax prostate muscles or shrink prostate tissue

Surgical resection of prostate tissue

Laser procedure that removes obstructing prostate tissue

Steam ablation therapy that reduces prostate tissue over time

Temporary nitinol implant that reshapes the urethra

Drug-coated balloon dilation to widen the prostatic urethra

HOSPITAL STAY

Outpatient

1-2 days

1 day

Outpatient

Outpatient

Outpatient

ANESTHESIA

None required

General or spinal

General or spinal

Local or mild sedation

Local or mild sedation

Local or mild sedation

DURATION

Continuous treatment

1-2 hours

1.5-2.5 hours

5-10 minutes

5-7 minutes

10-15 minutes

COVERED BY OHIP

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

RECOVERY TIME

2-6 weeks for symptom relief

2-6 weeks

2-3 weeks

2-6 weeks

1-2 weeks

1-3 weeks

NEED FOR CATHETER

No

Yes, 3-7 days

Yes, 1-2 days

Yes, 2-7 days

No

Yes, 2 days

PRESERVES SEXUAL FUNCTION

Often lost¹

~70-86%²

~85-95%⁴
Technique-dependent

~98-100%; no de novo ED⁶

~98-100%; no de novo ED⁹

~98-100%; no de novo ED¹¹

PRESERVES EJACULATION

Often lost¹

~27-35%³

~10-40%⁴

~97%⁷

Yes¹⁰

~98-100%¹¹

SYMPTOM RELIEF DURATION

Varies with use¹

10-15 years³

4-10 years⁵

95% free of retreatment at 5 years⁸

5+ years, 11% retreatment

3-5 years¹² 

¹ D. Singh et al., 2025. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Sexual Dysfunction.

² Taher A. Erectile dysfunction after transurethral resection of the prostate: incidence and risk factors. World J Urol. 2004;22(6):457-460. doi:10.1007/s00345-004-0449-1.

³ Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)—incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):969-979.

⁴ Li P, Wang C, Tang M, Han P, Meng X. Holmium laser enucleation of prostate by using en-bloc and bladder neck preservation technique: technical consideration and influence on functional outcomes. Transl Androl Urol. 2021;10(1):134-142. doi:10.21037/tau-20-852.

⁵ Fallara G, Capogrosso P, Schifano N, et al. Ten-year follow-up results after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: durable relief of urinary symptoms in almost 75% of patients. Eur Urol Focus. 2021;7(3):612-617. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2020.05.012 PubMed

⁶ McVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG. Rezūm water vapor thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: 5-year results from randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2021;206(3):715-724. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001778.

⁷ Connor MJ, Sturch P, Barber NJ. Preservation of sexual function following convective water vapor energy ablation of the prostate: real-world outcomes. J Urol. 2021;206(Suppl 3):e9-e10. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000002062.

⁸ McVary KT, Roehrborn CG. Three- and 5-year outcomes of water vapor thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2018;200(2):405-413. Updated 5-year data in: J Urol. 2021;206(3):715-724. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000001778.

⁹ De Nunzio C, Cantiello F, Fiori C, et al. Urinary and sexual function after treatment with temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in men with LUTS: 6-month interim results of the MT-06-study. World J Urol. 2021;39(6):2037-2042. doi:10.1007/s00345-020-03418-2.

¹⁰ Chughtai B, Elterman D, Shore N, et al. The iTind temporarily implanted nitinol device for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Urology. 2020;S0090-4295(20)31520-X. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.022.

¹¹ Kaplan SA, Moss J, Freedman S, et al. The PINNACLE study: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study evaluating the Optilume BPH catheter system for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2023;210(1):109-119. doi:10.1097/JU.0000000000003568.

¹² Kaplan SA, Pichardo M, Rijo E, Espino G, Rodriguez Lay R, Estrella R. Long-term outcomes after treatment with Optilume BPH: four-year results from the EVEREST study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024;18(11):E319-E325. doi:10.5489/cuaj.8737.

Urology Innovations Canada (UIC) is a leading provider of advanced, minimally invasive treatments for prostate cancer, BPH, and other urological conditions. As the first clinic in downtown Toronto to offer NanoKnife (IRE) and one of the most experienced HIFU providers in North America, we specialize in precision focal therapies that prioritize effectiveness while preserving quality of life. Our expert team serves patients from Toronto, the Greater Toronto Area, across Canada, and internationally.

The reviews and testimonials featured on this website represent the individual experiences of our patients. Results may vary from person to person, and no outcome is guaranteed. These reviews are intended to provide insight into the experiences of others and should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. Please book a consultation with one of our Toronto urologists to determine the best course of treatment for your unique needs.

© 2025 Urology Innovations Canada. All rights reserved.